In spite of his decisive primary win in Florida, Republicans just don't seem thrilled with Mitt Romney. That was the theme of this post when I began drafting it. But then Mitt Romney made a statement that reflects everything that is wrong with the GOP frontrunner that I had to adjust the topic to address the statement's absolute ignorance, and Romney's seeming inability to grasp the economic plight of many Americans...the very Americans he aspires to lead.
Romney told CNN's Soledad O'Brien in an interview yesterday morning that "I am not concerned about the very poor. There's a safety net there." He added that he is focused on “middle-income Americans…the 90 to 95 percent of Americans who right now are struggling.” The statement was made even more troubling when he elaborated on it, an attempt at clarification that instead wedged his foot more firmly in his already-full-of-silver-spoon mouth. Romney stated that the reason he wasn't worried about the poor is because the U.S. has an "ample safety net" and that if there were holes in that safety net, he'd fix them. He referred specifically to food stamps, Medicaid, and housing vouchers as part of that safety net.
But wait. This is the same Mitt Romney who said that the federal government should reduce its commitment to Medicaid and food stamps (officially titled the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) by making states responsible for both, with federal support coming only from block grants. Who would not extend unemployment benefits. Who said that the government should not help prevent foreclosures, "so the market can bottom out". Who promised that if elected president he would make an immediate 5 percent cut to non-discretionary spending. He has threatened since the beginning of his campaign to reduce the very safety net that he now touts. He can't have it both ways.
It's not only this contradiction that's troubling. Data released by the U.S. Census Bureau in September showed that just over 46 million Americans—or 15.1 percent of the population—lived below the official poverty line. This is much more than the 5% of the US population that Romney claims makes up "the poor". Is Mitt Romney honestly not concerned about 15% of the US population? And is he really only interested in keeping this segment barely afloat in their "safety net", rather than instituting policies that might actually help lift them OUT of poverty? What about middle class Americans who are slipping ever closer to poverty due to unemployment or foreclosure? Would he stop being concerned about them once they fell into the safety net?
But most concerning is his assumption that the United States' system of programs for the needy is "ample", which is simply incorrect. The programs that currently exist to assist the poor are insufficient for the number of people who need them today. Medicaid is not available to everyone with low income; poor adults without children or disability often do not qualify for it. Due to budgetary restraints, only about one in four people eligible for HUD housing vouchers (which partially subsidize rent payments) actually receive them. And federal funding of TANF (Temporary Aid for Needy Families, the program that replaced what we often refer to as welfare) was cut in every state in 2011 and is currently only funded on a short-term basis. Those holes in the safety net to which Romney referred already exist, but he doesn't appear to see them. Or perhaps he's simply decided that he's willing to sacrifice the votes of the poor in order to get the votes of the middle class.
Some will dismiss this as just an inartfully phrased comment, another Romney blooper. Of course it was. In was an inartful comment that shows his complete lack of understanding of the plight of those who are struggling. I don't think Mitt Romney actually doesn't care about poor people. He is simply so unable to relate to having a low income that he can't comment about it without looking like an insensitive buffoon. Regardless, in tough economic times, is that the kind of person who should become President?
Fresh fruit That will Burns up Fat-or Can it
---------------------------------------------------------------
Do you want to reduce fat rapidly and much more effectively? There is certainly available nowadays an all natural draw out from the herb which is indigenous in order to Philippines which is usually Garcina Cambogia.
What exactly is Garcina Cambogia Remove?
This can be a really small, pumpkin-shaped fresh fruit which is also called tamarind. It really is indigenous in order to Philippines and it is cultivated within S.e. Asian countries, Indian plus Main plus Western The african continent. It really is utilized in a lot of Southern Hard anodized cookware meals typically, like chutneys plus curries. This particular fresh fruit can also be utilized for healing seafood plus upkeep.
By having this particular component in order to foods it really is regarded as quite effective for making foods fill up a person upward quicker. In certain towns within Malaysia, this particular fresh fruit can be used for making soups that may be consumed in front of you dinner for losing weight because of Cambodias appetite-blocking skills.
Is Fresh fruit Efficient?
This particular fresh fruit continues to be well-researched along with more than a number of numerous scientific studies performed through the years. Frequently, analysis uncovers the strength associated with Garcinia Cambogia offers for your weight loss as well as the development associated with healthful diet plan.
What exactly can make Cambogia therefore efficient will not it truly function? Cambogia is really a yellowish fresh fruit which is designed kind of just like a pumpkin plus it passes additional titles throughout S.e. Asian countries as well as other region and it is consumed being a as well as the particular rind is utilized within conventional dishes within southern Indian.
The particular draw out comes from mainly the particular rind, that is dried out plus healed and possesses hydroxycitric acids HCA that is a compound promoted in order to obstruct sugar plus extra fat whilst controlling appetites.
Study and research
Research has been carried out from Saint Lukes Medical center the particular Being overweight Diet Analysis Middle within Nyc to find out issue fresh fruit acquired any kind of benefit since anti-obesity indicates. There have been 135 overweight men and women who had been hired with this research also it final regarding twelve several weeks. These were divided in to two groupings, 1 received the natural substance associated with hydroxycitric acid solution as well as the some other getting a placebo. Both these organizations had been recommended exactly the same low-energy, plus high-fiber diet plan.
Both in organizations the particular sufferers dropped a lot of bodyweight. However, there was clearly actually simply no significant distinction within the % associated with excess fat reduction. Scientists figured garcinia cambogia zen cleanse unsuccessfully to exhibit significant weight reduction plus weight loss greater than what has been noticed having a placebo.
The particular Diary associated with Being overweight at the end of the year 2010 released a write-up upon research that will examined Garcinia as being a item for losing weight. From the twenty three tests analyzed, just 12 had been think about audio methodologically sufficient to incorporate. The particular evaluation exposed that will a few statistically important weight reduction do take place. In addition they learned that uncomfortable stomach activities happened two times as frequently within the hydroxycitric team within the particular placebo team.
Consequently , simply because this really is becoming extremely supported plus promoted with a physician in the tv, doesnt essential ensure it is therefore?
Posted by: simply click the following internet site | 12/02/2013 at 04:08 PM
The Bullock Pulpit: Calculated musings of a pragmatic idealist: The poor should be very concerned about Mitt Romney
http://www.barberelectric513.com/moncler-down-coats-gray-p-635.html http://www.barberelectric513.com/moncler-down-coats-gray-p-635.html
釣魚島 http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/中国
HTTP://WWW.BARBERELECTRIC513.COM/MONCLER-JACKETS-RED-P-325.HTML http://www.barberelectric513.com/moncler-jackets-red-p-325.html
ブタ http://www.kantei.go.jp/
猪 http://www.kantei.go.jp/
nike官方鞋子型錄 http://www.nikefree.com.tw/
釣魚島 読み方 http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/中国
Nike 2013新款鞋子型錄 http://www.nikefree.com.tw/
Posted by: Nike 2013新款鞋子型錄 | 12/02/2013 at 04:05 PM
The Bullock Pulpit: Calculated musings of a pragmatic idealist: The poor should be very concerned about Mitt Romney
ztpbpvrb http://www.g6712v917s8x7m672baq7j3lqc5hok6as.org/
aztpbpvrb
[url=http://www.g6712v917s8x7m672baq7j3lqc5hok6as.org/]uztpbpvrb[/url]
Posted by: ztpbpvrb | 12/02/2013 at 04:28 AM
The Bullock Pulpit: Calculated musings of a pragmatic idealist: The poor should be very concerned about Mitt Romney
Posted by: Michael Kors väska har varit mode i stil | 12/02/2013 at 04:01 AM
The Bullock Pulpit: Calculated musings of a pragmatic idealist: The poor should be very concerned about Mitt Romney
Posted by: Lululemon Sale Online | 11/28/2013 at 01:23 AM
I know these are generally sweet; my pal will have the light red bailey handles and then the bailey johnson triplet in your intense atlantic ocean. Compared to help you vintage oreo 5s cyber monday their far better also shearling interiors feel too thin specifically when unbuttoned. I purchased often the Bailey Control buttons in the krinkle and while My family and i given these guys they were tattered exactly where the particular check came to be connected to the oreo 5s cyber monday by your buttons. I think their shortest a person's attempt a amount larger than these triplets.
Posted by: oreo 5s cyber monday | 11/27/2013 at 09:10 PM
The Bullock Pulpit: Calculated musings of a pragmatic idealist: The poor should be very concerned about Mitt Romney
Posted by: Cheap Michael Kors Handbags | 11/27/2013 at 03:57 AM
The Bullock Pulpit: Calculated musings of a pragmatic idealist: The poor should be very concerned about Mitt Romney
Posted by: Taoism | 11/23/2013 at 08:30 AM
Are you really surprised? (Probably not.)
This is the person who tied his dog's crate - complete with dog - to the top of his car and then drove twelve hours.
This is the person who can casually offer a ten-thousand dollar bet.
This is a person for whom $370,000 for speaking engagements is 'not very much'.
Utterly out of touch.
Posted by: RayM | 02/02/2012 at 05:02 PM
I think the answer is self evident. Nice post Pam.
If anything he appears far more out of it than Dubya - which is just a little scary!
I really truly hope the Obama campaign machine gets smart and pounds on whomever (assumingly romney) they pick... Because none look like anyone I want in charge around here... Clueless doesn't even begin to cover it...
I really need to start blogging more politico stuff...been caught up in other stuff...letting it all get away from me;)
Posted by: elisa | 02/02/2012 at 11:34 AM